Closer to the nub of it, if ‘it’ is what we’ve dubbed
the source of this pusillanimous contention, what
in the wash it actually was is lost in a controversy
unable to stand-off its ‘origins’ of palaeolithic self-
centredness; ‘I’ becomes ‘we’ while their scenery
revolves around dissent for and against who’s in
the only chair of supposed reasoning that ‘its’ an
adjunct of ‘me’ & which naturally means ‘us’ -
You facetiously declare hold on, you swing on a
limb with simian-like anthropological flair, it isn’t
a subject where what you think matters more or
whatever seems more real to you is the lore we
need to abide by - ‘it’ is uncontroversially not, &
wasn’t ever, the lottery you’ve almost contrived
© 16 January 2015, I. D. Carswell
No comments:
Post a Comment