If it comes to a contest between hijab, yarmulka
and lawyers in-court dress - I’d say prejudice is
hidden more effectively by legal office ‘robes’
We could widen debate into any form of office
regalia and find the same determination in any
de jure rationalisation’s locum for reason
Ideas any one word can be redefined to mean
legalised arcadia gives Pan the door to where
juridical anarchy finds humour indictable
And they’re laughably attired in dress which
says this is a standing joke - but don’t poke
fun at it or you’ll regret ever mentioning it
Especially in session - where all aims are to
be fair and reasonable and within meanings
ascribed by the same jurisdictional farce
And they have the last word on it
© 8 December 2014, I. D. Carswell
No comments:
Post a Comment