If there’s an anomaly I’d guess it isn’t in the heat,
that’s too easily measured to be an expression of
aberrant prediction - there difficulties seem to be,
more or less, bound up in who’s forecasting, and
where they’re actually situated - the further away
being key to greater inaccuracy; and so, if its 38º
on the patio instead of 31º as we’re expecting, it
blazes blue murder on what we call forecasting
aberrancy: categorically heat doesn’t equivocate,
in that sense it’s bent treating us all equal, so we
have to blame the inequality on who guessed its
parameters, and lent an element of credibility by
publishing the damn things - & once again - well
met - Bureau of Meteo(ineligible)ontology
© 21 January 2016, I. D. Carswell
No comments:
Post a Comment